The proposal that these three enzymes all go through a similar high-valent oxo intermediate, i.e., 3 or compound I, raises two interesting questions. The first of these is why the same high-valent metal-oxo intermediate gives two very different types of reactions, i.e., oxygen-atom transfer with cytochrome P-450 and electron transfer with catalase and peroxidase. The answer is that, although the high-valent metal-oxo heme cores of these intermediates are in fact very similar, the substrate-binding cavities seem to differ substantially in how much access the substrate has to the iron center. With cytochrome P-450, the substrate is jammed right up against the location where the oxo ligand must reside in the high-valent oxo intermediate. But the same location in the peroxidase enzymes is blocked by the protein structure so that substrates can interact only with the heme edge. Thus oxidation of the substrate by electron transfer is possible for catalase and peroxidase, but the substrate is too far away from the oxo ligand for oxygen-atom transfer.
The second question is about how the the high-valent oxo intermediate forms in both enzymes. For catalase and peroxidase, the evidence indicates that hydrogen peroxide binds to the ferric center and then undergoes heterolysis at the 0-0 bond. Heterolytic cleavage requires a significant separation of positive and negative charge in the transition state. In catalase and peroxidase, analysis of the crystal structure indicates strongly that amino-acid side chains are situated to aid in the cleavage by stabilizing a charge-separated transition state (Figure 5.14). In cytochrome P-450, as mentioned in Section V.C.1, no such groups
are found in the hydrophobic substrate-binding cavity. It is possible that the cysteinyl axial ligand in cytochrome P-450 plays an important role in 0-0 bond cleavage, and that the interactions found in catalase and peroxidase that appear to facilitate such cleavage are therefore not necessary.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar